家彩网客户端下载_360百科

来源：家彩网走势图2021-03-06 17:48

家彩网客户端下载

以担当作为奋进新征程******

　　以担当作为奋进新征程(大家谈·一起来想一起来干②·新时代新征程新伟业)

　　党的二十大报告提出：“全面建设社会主义现代化国家，必须充分发挥亿万人民的创造伟力。”本期大家谈，我们选刊3篇来稿，感受各地贯彻落实党的二十大精神热潮，激励广大干部职工立足本职岗位担当作为，以实际行动奋进新征程、建功新时代。

　　——编者

　　进一步优化营商环境

　　山东济南市何婷

　　良好的营商环境是企业健康发展的沃土，也是高质量发展的题中应有之义。党的二十大报告提出：“营造市场化、法治化、国际化一流营商环境。”这为我们进一步优化营商环境指明了方向。

　　针对企业融资难融资贵的问题，积极协调金融单位上门开展银企对接服务；实施品牌强企计划，指导19家企业完成山东省高端品牌培育企业申报；为科技园区高质量高标准发展提供政策支持；实施涉企轻微违法行为不予行政处罚、从轻减轻行政处罚清单机制……一段时间以来，山东济南市市中区持续优化营商环境，采取一系列举措，为企业纾困解难。奋进新征程，我们必须继续聚焦企业需求，找准小切口和着力点，进一步优化营商环境。

　　营商环境既直接关系市场主体发展活力，又事关城市发展。一手抓严格执法，一手抓优化服务，全面构建亲清政商关系，统筹打好政策惠企、服务便企“组合拳”，一定能持续提升市场主体活力和满意度，助推高质量发展。

　　提高行政执法效能

　　湖南长沙市刘昕

　　党的二十大报告提出，“深化行政执法体制改革，全面推进严格规范公正文明执法”。依法行政，文明执法，提高行政效率和公信力，是每一个基层行政执法工作者必须履行的职责。

　　我所在的湖南长沙市湘江新区行政执法局自成立以来，就承担起新区行政执法改革的重任。一方面，我们抓实各类监管整治，归集梳理涉及市区两级共计4000余项行政执法权，实施“一张清单管到底”。另一方面，创新推进基层治理，全面整合基层执法，将80%以上的执法力量下沉一线，让沟通协调在一线、问题解决在一线。面向未来，加快推动横向部门整体协同，纵向条线贯通落实，才能进一步提高执法能力和水平，让执法工作更好地取信于民、服务于民。

　　风劲潮涌，扬帆破浪。对于基层行政执法工作人员而言，不仅要自觉践行“严格规范公正文明执法”的要求，也要注意改进执法方式，灵活运用说服教育、劝导示范、警示告诫等方式，引导群众自觉遵守法律法规，努力实现执法效果与社会效果相统一。

　　增强群众司法获得感

　　湖北枝江市姚宇思

　　法者，治之端也。党的二十大报告提出：“必须更好发挥法治固根本、稳预期、利长远的保障作用，在法治轨道上全面建设社会主义现代化国家。”

　　人民法院作为国家审判机关，是全面依法治国的重要参与者、积极推动者和坚定维护者。近年来，我所在的基层法院致力打通诉源治理“最后一公里”，把司法服务延伸到老百姓家门口，让群众切实感受到公平正义就在身边。坚持和发展新时代“枫桥经验”，为老百姓提供“点单式”司法服务，充分利用网络法庭、巡回法庭化解纠纷，这些举措都不断增强着群众司法获得感。

　　新征程上，作为一名基层法院干警，我将恪守岗位要求、践行职责使命，为法治国家、法治政府、法治社会一体建设贡献力量。（人民日报）

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.